Shivkumar So Bhimaraya Age 33 Years Occ Agriculture Ro Bhar Peth Chittapu Tq Chittapur Dist Kalabura vs The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur — 3225/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520044112025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
3225/2025
Filing Date
01-12-2025
Registration No
3225/2025
Registration Date
01-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivkumar So Bhimaraya Age 33 Years Occ Agriculture Ro Bhar Peth Chittapu Tq Chittapur Dist Kalabura
Adv. Mallikarjun Shankreppa
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
ORDERS
ENQUIRY PARTIES
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 20-02-2026 | ENQUIRY PARTIES |
| 12-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 3225/2025 In this civil miscellaneous case filed by Shivkumar (age 33, agriculturist) against the Registrar of Birth and Death at TMC Office Chittapur, the petitioner's affidavit was recorded on 13.03.2026. The court admitted five documentary exhibits including copies of the original petition, affidavit, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and published notices. Since the respondent was unrepresented (ex-parte), no cross-examination was conducted. The case was heard on merit without further examination, and the matter was referred back to the lower court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3225/2025 In this civil miscellaneous case filed by Shivkumar (age 33, agriculturist) against the Registrar of Birth and Death at TMC Office Chittapur, the petitioner's affidavit was recorded on 13.03.2026. The court admitted five documentary exhibits including copies of the original petition, affidavit, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and published notices. Since the respondent was unrepresented (ex-parte), no cross-examination was conducted. The case was heard on merit without further examination, and the matter was referred back to the lower court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts