Malleshi Malleshappa S/o Late Devappa Devindarappa Age 40, R/o Kardal. vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur — 2581/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section SEC13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520036142025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-09-2025
Filing Number
2581/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
2581/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malleshi Malleshappa S/o Late Devappa Devindarappa Age 40, R/o Kardal.
Adv. Mallikarjun Shankreppa
Sukhdevi W/o Late.Devappa alias Devindrappa Age 60 R/o Kardal.
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur
All concerned.
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | ORDERS |
| 29-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 17-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Crl.Misc. 2581/2025, the court heard petitioners Malleshi Malleshappa and Sukhdevi's petition against the Registrar of Birth and Death, Tahasil Office Chittapur on 20-02-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit as the main evidence and produced supporting documents including an application copy, affidavit, genealogical certificate, Aadhar card copy, and published notices. The respondent was found to be ex-parte (unrepresented), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded without re-examination, and the fingerprint impressions were recorded on the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Crl.Misc. 2581/2025, the court heard petitioners Malleshi Malleshappa and Sukhdevi's petition against the Registrar of Birth and Death, Tahasil Office Chittapur on 20-02-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit as the main evidence and produced supporting documents including an application copy, affidavit, genealogical certificate, Aadhar card copy, and published notices. The respondent was found to be ex-parte (unrepresented), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case proceeded without re-examination, and the fingerprint impressions were recorded on the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts