Rajappa S/o Siddappa Moulimani Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Indankal Village Tq Kalgi vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tehsildar Kalgi — 2354/2025

Case under U/sec 13(3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520031332025

ORDERS

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

16-06-2025

Filing Number

2354/2025

Filing Date

16-07-2025

Registration No

2354/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

U/sec 13(3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

Rajappa S/o Siddappa Moulimani Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Indankal Village Tq Kalgi

Adv. Mohammed Ali Pashumiyan

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tehsildar Kalgi

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

ORDERS

27-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

06-12-2025

SUMMONS

04-08-2025

FIRST HEARING

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 2354/2025, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested that the affidavit be considered as the main evidence. Five documentary exhibits were admitted into the record (NIPs 1-6), including copies of the petition, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent was found to be unilateral (ex-parte), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case was disposed without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 2354/2025, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested that the affidavit be considered as the main evidence. Five documentary exhibits were admitted into the record (NIPs 1-6), including copies of the petition, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent was found to be unilateral (ex-parte), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case was disposed without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case