Rajappa S/o Siddappa Moulimani Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Indankal Village Tq Kalgi vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tehsildar Kalgi — 2354/2025

Case under U/sec 13(3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Orders Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520031332025

e-Filing Number

16-06-2025

Filing Number

2354/2025

Filing Date

16-Jul-2025

Registration No

2354/2025

Registration Date

16-Jul-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U/sec 13(3) Birth and Death Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajappa S/o Siddappa Moulimani Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Indankal Village Tq Kalgi

    Adv. Mohammed Ali Pashumiyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tehsildar Kalgi

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 2354/2025, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested that the affidavit be considered as the main evidence. Five documentary exhibits were admitted into the record (NIPs 1-6), including copies of the petition, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent was found to be unilateral (ex-parte), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case was disposed without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  6. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2354/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 2354/2025, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested that the affidavit be considered as the main evidence. Five documentary exhibits were admitted into the record (NIPs 1-6), including copies of the petition, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent was found to be unilateral (ex-parte), and no cross-examination was conducted. The case was disposed without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case