Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi vs Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi — 956/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB520018852024

HEARING

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

956/2024

Filing Date

19-06-2024

Registration No

956/2024

Registration Date

19-06-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi

Adv. GS

Respondent(s)

Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

27-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

HEARING

06-02-2026

OBJECTION

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

11-12-2025
313 Statement
21-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case