Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi vs Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi — 956/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB520018852024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
956/2024
Filing Date
19-06-2024
Registration No
956/2024
Registration Date
19-06-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi
Adv. GS
Respondent(s)
Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-02-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts