Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi vs Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi — 956/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB520018852024

Filing Number

956/2024

Filing Date

19-Jun-2024

Registration No

956/2024

Registration Date

19-Jun-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Udayakumar S/o Shivabasappa Mangalgi Age 50 yrs Occ Govt Servant R/o JR Nagar Khadri chowk Kalburgi

    Adv. GS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nasir Ali S/o Roshan Ali C/o HNo.1-1495/105/2/120/3D MSK Mill road Godutai Nagar Kalaburagi

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Arguments-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    313 StatementView PDF

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  17. 04-Jun-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  18. 20-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  22. 16-Dec-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  25. 19-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 956/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (C.C No. 956/2024) This is a court examination record (PW-1) in a criminal case involving allegations of dishonest transactions. The witness (a government school teacher) testified that he gave cash to the accused, contradicting his own complaint petition where he had not mentioned this transaction. The witness admitted to having no documentary evidence and acknowledged giving false statements to the court. The examination reveals multiple inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding the accused's identity, the circumstances of payment, and the authenticity of Exhibit NI-1 (a cheque allegedly filled by the accused using different handwriting and ink). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case