Kishanrao S/o Tukappa @ Tukaram Kulkarni Age 75 yrs Occ Agi R/o Margol Tq Chittapur vs Chandrashekhar S/o Shankarappa Goni Age 45 yrs Occ Agri R/o H.No. D-67/B, Laxminarayan Nagar Vasava — 41/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB520018712024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
40/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishanrao S/o Tukappa @ Tukaram Kulkarni Age 75 yrs Occ Agi R/o Margol Tq Chittapur
Adv. Smt. M.V. Ladda Adv.
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekhar S/o Shankarappa Goni Age 45 yrs Occ Agri R/o H.No. D-67/B, Laxminarayan Nagar Vasava
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 25-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
In OS No. 41/2024, the court called the witness for examination on 04-12-2025 and recorded affidavit testimony. Various documents including survey records (Nos. 12, 13), computer-generated copies (2001-2024), survey reports, and authenticated copies of official letters dated 30.03.1999 were marked as exhibits (Exs. 1-6, 7-31, 32-35). The respondent's counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In OS No. 41/2024, the court called the witness for examination on 04-12-2025 and recorded affidavit testimony. Various documents including survey records (Nos. 12, 13), computer-generated copies (2001-2024), survey reports, and authenticated copies of official letters dated 30.03.1999 were marked as exhibits (Exs. 1-6, 7-31, 32-35). The respondent's counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts