Kishanrao S/o Tukappa @ Tukaram Kulkarni Age 75 yrs Occ Agi R/o Margol Tq Chittapur vs Chandrashekhar S/o Shankarappa Goni Age 45 yrs Occ Agri R/o H.No. D-67/B, Laxminarayan Nagar Vasava — 41/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB520018712024

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

40/2024

Filing Date

18-06-2024

Registration No

41/2024

Registration Date

18-06-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Kishanrao S/o Tukappa @ Tukaram Kulkarni Age 75 yrs Occ Agi R/o Margol Tq Chittapur

Adv. Smt. M.V. Ladda Adv.

Respondent(s)

Chandrashekhar S/o Shankarappa Goni Age 45 yrs Occ Agri R/o H.No. D-67/B, Laxminarayan Nagar Vasava

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

04-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

25-09-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

04-12-2025
Deposition

In OS No. 41/2024, the court called the witness for examination on 04-12-2025 and recorded affidavit testimony. Various documents including survey records (Nos. 12, 13), computer-generated copies (2001-2024), survey reports, and authenticated copies of official letters dated 30.03.1999 were marked as exhibits (Exs. 1-6, 7-31, 32-35). The respondent's counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In OS No. 41/2024, the court called the witness for examination on 04-12-2025 and recorded affidavit testimony. Various documents including survey records (Nos. 12, 13), computer-generated copies (2001-2024), survey reports, and authenticated copies of official letters dated 30.03.1999 were marked as exhibits (Exs. 1-6, 7-31, 32-35). The respondent's counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case