Jagadevi D/o Mallinath Desai W/o Gurupadappa Age 37 Yrs R/o Pragati Colony Sedam Road Kalaburagi vs Maqllinath S/o Chadramappa Desai Age 67 Yrs R/o Plot No.9 Prashant Nagar(A)Shahabad Road Kalaburagi — 3/2024

Case under U/sec 54 Cpc Section 18 of CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAKB520017452024

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

27-Apr-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

27-Apr-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/sec 54 Cpc Section 18 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagadevi D/o Mallinath Desai W/o Gurupadappa Age 37 Yrs R/o Pragati Colony Sedam Road Kalaburagi

    Adv. Manish Apte

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maqllinath S/o Chadramappa Desai Age 67 Yrs R/o Plot No.9 Prashant Nagar(A)Shahabad Road Kalaburagi

  2. 2.Chandrakant S/o Mallinath Desai Age 45 yrs R/o Plot No.9 Prashant nagar (A) Shahabad Road Kalaburagi

  3. 3.Shivalingappa S/o Mallinath Desai Age 43 yrs R/o Plot No.9 Prashant nagar(A)Shahabad Road Kalaburagi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: FDP 3/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed the final decree petition and approved the property division proposed by the court commissioner. Petitioner Jagadevi was awarded her 1/4th share in the disputed agricultural property (Block I: 1 acre 21 guntas 4 anas in Survey No. 102/*/1, Khaddargi village), while respondents collectively received the remaining 3/4th share (Block II: 4 acres 25 guntas 4 anas). Key Reasoning: The division was based on a prior preliminary decree (OS 48/2023) entitling the petitioner to 1/4th ownership. Since respondents failed to object to the court-appointed surveyor's report and the allocation conformed to the judgment, the court accepted the partition proposal as just and equitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 02-May-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  17. 27-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  19. 01-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  20. 25-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  21. 12-Dec-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  22. 30-Nov-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  23. 08-Nov-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  25. 30-Aug-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  26. 18-Jul-2024

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  27. 15-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 27-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FDP 3/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed the final decree petition and approved the property division proposed by the court commissioner. Petitioner Jagadevi was awarded her 1/4th share in the disputed agricultural property (Block I: 1 acre 21 guntas 4 anas in Survey No. 102/*/1, Khaddargi village), while respondents collectively received the remaining 3/4th share (Block II: 4 acres 25 guntas 4 anas). Key Reasoning: The division was based on a prior preliminary decree (OS 48/2023) entitling the petitioner to 1/4th ownership. Since respondents failed to object to the court-appointed surveyor's report and the allocation conformed to the judgment, the court accepted the partition proposal as just and equitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case