State Through Wadi Railway PS vs Kareem Son of Hussain — 148/2026
Case under 92(O) and (R) Kp Act Section 92. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB520010352026
Filing Number
151/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
148/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0
Police Station
WADI RAILWAY PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Wadi Railway PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kareem Son of Hussain
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
In Case 148/2026 (State Through Wadi Railway PS v. Kareem Son of Hussain), the accused was referred to Pre-conciliation Lok Adalath at his request. After conciliation proceedings, the accused agreed to plead guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the K.P. Act. The court accepted the guilty plea and convicted the accused, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 50/-, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. The case was subsequently disposed as settled before the Lok Adalath after the accused paid the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Restored
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2026
In Case 148/2026 (State Through Wadi Railway PS v. Kareem Son of Hussain), the accused was referred to Pre-conciliation Lok Adalath at his request. After conciliation proceedings, the accused agreed to plead guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the K.P. Act. The court accepted the guilty plea and convicted the accused, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 50/-, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. The case was subsequently disposed as settled before the Lok Adalath after the accused paid the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts