State Through Wadi Railway PS vs Akhilesh Son of Mallikarjun — 147/2026

Case under 92(O) and (R) Kp Act Section 92. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB520010342026

Filing Number

150/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0

Police Station

WADI RAILWAY PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

92(O) and (R) Kp Act Section 92

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Through Wadi Railway PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akhilesh Son of Mallikarjun

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 147/2026 Summary The accused Akhilesh was referred to Pre-conciliation Lok Adalath at his request, where he agreed to plead guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the K.P. Act. The court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 50/-, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The case was subsequently disposed as settled before Lok Adalath after the accused paid the fine amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 147/2026 Summary The accused Akhilesh was referred to Pre-conciliation Lok Adalath at his request, where he agreed to plead guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the K.P. Act. The court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 50/-, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The case was subsequently disposed as settled before Lok Adalath after the accused paid the fine amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case