Dattatrayarao S/o Ishwarrao Phulse Age 73 Yrs R/o Centum Rage School Main Wadi (Jn) Tq.Chittapur vs Mohammed Rafi S/o Abdul Kaim R/o Near Granny Building Wadi(Jn) Tq.Chittapur Dt.Kalaburagi — 8/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 Cpc R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 151. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB520008902024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
04-03-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatrayarao S/o Ishwarrao Phulse Age 73 Yrs R/o Centum Rage School Main Wadi (Jn) Tq.Chittapur
Adv. R.Vinod Kumar
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Rafi S/o Abdul Kaim R/o Near Granny Building Wadi(Jn) Tq.Chittapur Dt.Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In OS 8/2024 (PW-1), the court examined evidence related to rental agreements dated 22-01-2016 to 22-11-2017 and 01-08-2018, along with a legal notice dated 01-01-2024. The witness was called for examination on 10-07-2025 and sworn in. The party objection was dismissed as the defendants were ex-parte (absent), and the main hearing proceedings continued with the plaintiff's counsel presenting documentary evidence marked as exhibits P-1 through P-7, including previous court orders from civil suit 3/2020 and M.M. 5/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In OS 8/2024 (PW-1), the court examined evidence related to rental agreements dated 22-01-2016 to 22-11-2017 and 01-08-2018, along with a legal notice dated 01-01-2024. The witness was called for examination on 10-07-2025 and sworn in. The party objection was dismissed as the defendants were ex-parte (absent), and the main hearing proceedings continued with the plaintiff's counsel presenting documentary evidence marked as exhibits P-1 through P-7, including previous court orders from civil suit 3/2020 and M.M. 5/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts