Bhartibai vs Rangamma — 51/2016

Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section 7rule1and2CP. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB520005882016

ORDERS

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

51/2016

Filing Date

14-06-2016

Registration No

51/2016

Registration Date

14-06-2016

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Section 7rule1and2CP

Petitioner(s)

Bhartibai

Adv. Ladda Mamata Vijayakumar

Chandrakala

Shashikala

Respondent(s)

Rangamma

Rangamma

Ashok

Krishna

Arjun

Vijayalaxmi

Shoba

Swaroopa

Ambika

Vimala

Sonabai

P.D2.Satyanarayan s/o Gundoji kamble

P.D13.Shivakumar s/o Gundoji kamble

P.D14 Jagdish s/o Gundoji kamble

P.D.15 Ram s/o Gundoji kamble

P.D.16 Janabi D/o Gundoji kamble

P.D.17 Narmada d/o Gundoji kamble

P.D.18 Hemalata d/o Gundoji kamble

P.D19 Sandyarani d/o Gundoji kamble

P.D.20 Jyoti d/o Gundoji kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

24-03-2026

ORDERS

07-03-2026

ORDERS

20-02-2026

ORDERS

24-01-2026

HEARING

08-01-2026

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

16-02-2023
Issue
14-07-2023
Deposition
21-03-2024
Deposition
14-02-2025
Deposition
22-03-2025
Deposition
22-03-2025
Deposition
22-03-2025
Deposition
20-06-2025
Deposition
03-07-2025
Deposition

Summary: In OS 51/2016 (DW-2), the court examined the defendant's witness on 03-07-2025, who submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of statements contained therein. The defendant's counsel requested that the affidavit be treated as the main evidence. The court admitted various survey documents from 1962-63, 1963-1973, and 2018-2022 as exhibits (D-1 through D-4). The case was adjourned for further proceedings before the civil judge at Chikkaballapur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS 51/2016 (DW-2), the court examined the defendant's witness on 03-07-2025, who submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of statements contained therein. The defendant's counsel requested that the affidavit be treated as the main evidence. The court admitted various survey documents from 1962-63, 1963-1973, and 2018-2022 as exhibits (D-1 through D-4). The case was adjourned for further proceedings before the civil judge at Chikkaballapur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case