Rupesh Kumar S/o Harising Age 33 yrs R/o Station Tanda, Chittapur vs Orient Cement Pvt Ltd, Itaga Tq. Chittapur Through its presidnet Shri Satyaprakash Sharma — 41/2018
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section ,. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB520004492018
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
41/2018
Filing Date
17-07-2018
Registration No
41/2018
Registration Date
17-07-2018
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupesh Kumar S/o Harising Age 33 yrs R/o Station Tanda, Chittapur
Adv. Ladda Mamata Vijayakumar
Balraj S/o Harising Age 32 yrs R/o Station Tanda, Chittapur
Krishnakumar S/o Harising Age 30 yrs R/o Station Tanda Chittapur
Respondent(s)
Orient Cement Pvt Ltd, Itaga Tq. Chittapur Through its presidnet Shri Satyaprakash Sharma
General Manager, Orient Cement Company Itaga Tq.Chittapur
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary Case No. OS 41/2018 – The court found that the defendant company (through SRC Company) caused pollution and crop damage to the plaintiff's agricultural land. The court ordered the defendant company to pay compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- to the plaintiff and noted that the defendant's witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The case was adjourned for further proceedings on 28-03-2026 for examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case No. OS 41/2018 – The court found that the defendant company (through SRC Company) caused pollution and crop damage to the plaintiff's agricultural land. The court ordered the defendant company to pay compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- to the plaintiff and noted that the defendant's witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The case was adjourned for further proceedings on 28-03-2026 for examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts