Tippanna S/o Subhash Chigarali Age 36 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Rampurhalli Village Tq Chittapur vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur — 19/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520000522026
e-Filing Number
30-12-2025
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tippanna S/o Subhash Chigarali Age 36 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Rampurhalli Village Tq Chittapur
Adv. Sharanagouda M Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur
-
2.All concerned
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
In Crl.Misc. 19/2026, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as main evidence. Five documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-6) were admitted into the record, including copies of applications, affidavits, ancestry certificates, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent being ex-parte, no party challenge was raised, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
In Crl.Misc. 19/2026, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as main evidence. Five documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-6) were admitted into the record, including copies of applications, affidavits, ancestry certificates, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent being ex-parte, no party challenge was raised, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts