Tippanna S/o Subhash Chigarali Age 36 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Rampurhalli Village Tq Chittapur vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur — 19/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520000522026

ORDERS

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

30-12-2025

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

Tippanna S/o Subhash Chigarali Age 36 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Rampurhalli Village Tq Chittapur

Adv. Sharanagouda M Patil

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur

All concerned

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

ORDERS

29-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

In Crl.Misc. 19/2026, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as main evidence. Five documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-6) were admitted into the record, including copies of applications, affidavits, ancestry certificates, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent being ex-parte, no party challenge was raised, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Crl.Misc. 19/2026, the witness (PW-1) was sworn in on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as main evidence. Five documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-6) were admitted into the record, including copies of applications, affidavits, ancestry certificates, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices. The respondent being ex-parte, no party challenge was raised, and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case