Narasappa S/o Mallappa Age 25 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Bhimanahalli Village vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur — 13/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520000362026

ORDERS

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

Narasappa S/o Mallappa Age 25 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Bhimanahalli Village

Adv. Bheemappa Doddamani

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur

All concerned

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

ORDERS

27-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary In Crl.Misc. 13/2026, the court examined a miscellaneous criminal petition on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as the main evidence. The court admitted various documentary evidence including the petition copy, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card notarized copies, and published notices, marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-6. No cross-examination was conducted as the respondent was ex-parte (unopposed), and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Crl.Misc. 13/2026, the court examined a miscellaneous criminal petition on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as the main evidence. The court admitted various documentary evidence including the petition copy, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card notarized copies, and published notices, marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-6. No cross-examination was conducted as the respondent was ex-parte (unopposed), and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case