Narasappa S/o Mallappa Age 25 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Bhimanahalli Village vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur — 13/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520000362026
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narasappa S/o Mallappa Age 25 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Bhimanahalli Village
Adv. Bheemappa Doddamani
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur
All concerned
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 27-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Crl.Misc. 13/2026, the court examined a miscellaneous criminal petition on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as the main evidence. The court admitted various documentary evidence including the petition copy, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card notarized copies, and published notices, marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-6. No cross-examination was conducted as the respondent was ex-parte (unopposed), and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Crl.Misc. 13/2026, the court examined a miscellaneous criminal petition on 06-03-2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of its contents and requested it be considered as the main evidence. The court admitted various documentary evidence including the petition copy, affidavits, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card notarized copies, and published notices, marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-6. No cross-examination was conducted as the respondent was ex-parte (unopposed), and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts