Smt. Sridevi W/o Shivakumar vs Raju S/o Yallappa — 5/2016
Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section u/o7rule1and2cpc. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB520000212016
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2016
Filing Date
11-01-2016
Registration No
5/2016
Registration Date
11-01-2016
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Sridevi W/o Shivakumar
Adv. G A Deshpande
Respondent(s)
Raju S/o Yallappa
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 19-02-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 5/2016 Court: Civil Court (Chittapur) Outcome: The court examined witness testimony (PW-3 and PW-4) regarding a finance company loan dispute. The court found that the defendant obtained a loan from a finance company operated by Shivakumar, and that a security document (marked as Exhibit NI-4) was executed as a guarantee for the loan. The court concluded that the witnesses gave false testimony to assist the defendant and Shivakumar, and held the security document valid. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the case proceeded based on the court's findings on witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 5/2016 Court: Civil Court (Chittapur) Outcome: The court examined witness testimony (PW-3 and PW-4) regarding a finance company loan dispute. The court found that the defendant obtained a loan from a finance company operated by Shivakumar, and that a security document (marked as Exhibit NI-4) was executed as a guarantee for the loan. The court concluded that the witnesses gave false testimony to assist the defendant and Shivakumar, and held the security document valid. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the case proceeded based on the court's findings on witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts