Anveer S/o Ramarao Age 7 yrs U/G Ramarao S/o Kheeru Age 36 yrs Occ Pvt. Work R/o 1/29/A Bennur (K) vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Kalagi — 1/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520000022026

ORDERS

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

0000

Police Station

KALGI PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13,

Petitioner(s)

Anveer S/o Ramarao Age 7 yrs U/G Ramarao S/o Kheeru Age 36 yrs Occ Pvt. Work R/o 1/29/A Bennur (K)

Adv. Maheshkumar S Doddamani

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Kalagi

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

04-04-2026

ORDERS

07-03-2026

ORDERS

20-02-2026

ORDERS

06-02-2026

ORDERS

31-01-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

21-01-2026
Deposition

Summary: In Crl.Misc. 1/2026, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of the petitioner (PW-1) on 21-01-2026. Four documentary exhibits were admitted into evidence: a copy of the petition filed with the opposite party (marked as Exh. 1), an affidavit (Exh. 2), an Aadhar card copy (Exh. 3), and a bonafide certificate from school (Exh. 4). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposite party was uncontested, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Crl.Misc. 1/2026, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of the petitioner (PW-1) on 21-01-2026. Four documentary exhibits were admitted into evidence: a copy of the petition filed with the opposite party (marked as Exh. 1), an affidavit (Exh. 2), an Aadhar card copy (Exh. 3), and a bonafide certificate from school (Exh. 4). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposite party was uncontested, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case