Smt. Sumitra D/o Malleshappa W/o Amruth Ankalgi Age 54yrs Occ Household R/o H.No. 13-676 13-677 vs Rajendra S/o Late Malleshappa Chiknalli age 49yrs Occ Pvt Service R/o Indira Nagar Maddi No. — 19/2023
Case under U/o 9 Rule 4 R/w Sec 151 of Cpc Section 9. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAKB510006622023
Filing Number
19/2023
Filing Date
01-Dec-2023
Registration No
19/2023
Registration Date
02-Dec-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Sumitra D/o Malleshappa W/o Amruth Ankalgi Age 54yrs Occ Household R/o H.No. 13-676 13-677
Adv. Sri,R.R.Rathod Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajendra S/o Late Malleshappa Chiknalli age 49yrs Occ Pvt Service R/o Indira Nagar Maddi No.
-
2.Smt Gouramma W/o Late Mahendra Chiknalli Age 40yrs Occ Household R/o Indira Nagar Maddi No.2
-
3.Sachindra S/o Late Malleshappa Chinalli Age 42 yrs Occ pvt Service R/o Indira Nagar Maddi No.2
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
06-Jan-2026
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
24-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In Civil Misc No. 19/2023, the court heard arguments on 24-10-2025 regarding a petition by the plaintiff challenging a lower court order dated 31-03-2022. The court found that the plaintiff filed false affidavits and gave false testimony, knowingly delayed proceedings, and filed the petition with malicious intent to harass the defendant despite being aware that the appeal had been dismissed. The petition is dismissed with observations that the plaintiff submitted false evidence and medical documents without proper substantiation, and the case is closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
10-Feb-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
16-Jan-2025
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
04-Dec-2024
Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
28-Oct-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
17-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
21-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
05-Jul-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
28-May-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
22-Mar-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
12-Feb-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
10-Jan-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Chittapur
-
04-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2023
Summary: In Civil Misc No. 19/2023, the court heard arguments on 24-10-2025 regarding a petition by the plaintiff challenging a lower court order dated 31-03-2022. The court found that the plaintiff filed false affidavits and gave false testimony, knowingly delayed proceedings, and filed the petition with malicious intent to harass the defendant despite being aware that the appeal had been dismissed. The petition is dismissed with observations that the plaintiff submitted false evidence and medical documents without proper substantiation, and the case is closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts