Mamathajbee W/o Imamasab Pulachadi Age-45yrs Occ-Agriculture now nil, vs Mahmad Asif Patel S/o Kasimsab Age-38yrs Occ-Owner of Car bearing NO. KA-33 M-4568, — 1306/2024
Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB510004972024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1349/2024
Filing Date
12-09-2024
Registration No
1306/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mamathajbee W/o Imamasab Pulachadi Age-45yrs Occ-Agriculture now nil,
Adv. Sri, Vishwanath Reddy Malipatil.
Respondent(s)
Mahmad Asif Patel S/o Kasimsab Age-38yrs Occ-Owner of Car bearing NO. KA-33 M-4568,
Through The Manager Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 23-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 1306/2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the insurance company cannot be held liable for compensation as the accident was caused by the defendant vehicle (KA-33-M-4658) hitting the petitioner's vehicle from behind, and the defendant driver admitted his fault in the criminal case. The insurance company argued they are not responsible for the compensation claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 1306/2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the insurance company cannot be held liable for compensation as the accident was caused by the defendant vehicle (KA-33-M-4658) hitting the petitioner's vehicle from behind, and the defendant driver admitted his fault in the criminal case. The insurance company argued they are not responsible for the compensation claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts