Subhash Adopted S/o Husanayya Age 53yrs Occ Teacher R/o Sulhalli Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburgi. vs Harish S/o late Sri Gangadhar Bele Age 45yrs Occ Service R/o plot NO. 167-B Mahanlaxmi Nagar Hudkes — 111/2023
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB510004682023
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
116/2023
Filing Date
07-08-2023
Registration No
111/2023
Registration Date
08-08-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Adopted S/o Husanayya Age 53yrs Occ Teacher R/o Sulhalli Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburgi.
Adv. Sri,S.D.R. Advocate
Respondent(s)
Harish S/o late Sri Gangadhar Bele Age 45yrs Occ Service R/o plot NO. 167-B Mahanlaxmi Nagar Hudkes
Shri Sunil Kumar S/o shobhagmal Maloo age 53yrs Occ agriculture and industrialist R/o plot
Shri Murli Manohar S/o shobhagmal Maloo age 46yrs Occ Agriculure and industrialist R/o plot No 167-B
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 19-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 27-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case No. 111/2023, dated 08-07-2025 The court examined the witness testimony and admitted documents including a will dated 31-03-2001 (marked as Exhibit 11) and a letter dated 25-10-1984 (marked as Exhibit 12). Based on the evidence presented, the court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant's challenge to the plaintiff's evidence was dismissed as the defendant appeared ex parte (unrepresented). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. 111/2023, dated 08-07-2025 The court examined the witness testimony and admitted documents including a will dated 31-03-2001 (marked as Exhibit 11) and a letter dated 25-10-1984 (marked as Exhibit 12). Based on the evidence presented, the court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant's challenge to the plaintiff's evidence was dismissed as the defendant appeared ex parte (unrepresented). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts