Mallayya S/o Gurulingayya Hiremath Age-69yrs Occ Nil vs Siddaram S/o Gurunath Wade Age-30yrs Occ-Owner of the Hyundai Car bearing no. KA-32 AA- — 1176/2024

Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB510004412024

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

983/2024

Filing Date

03-07-2024

Registration No

1176/2024

Registration Date

02-09-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Mallayya S/o Gurulingayya Hiremath Age-69yrs Occ Nil

Adv. Sri, V.S. Reddy

Shantabai W/o Mallayya Hiremath Age-64yrs Occ-Nil

Respondent(s)

Siddaram S/o Gurunath Wade Age-30yrs Occ-Owner of the Hyundai Car bearing no. KA-32 AA-

Through The Manager Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

12-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

23-01-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

01-08-2025
Deposition
04-12-2025
Issue
09-01-2026
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No: MVC 1176/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's claims in this motor vehicle accident compensation case. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding the accident circumstances and the deceased's dependents. The court held that the vehicle owner possessed valid driving license and insurance documentation, and that the court cannot be compelled to grant compensation. No further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: MVC 1176/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's claims in this motor vehicle accident compensation case. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding the accident circumstances and the deceased's dependents. The court held that the vehicle owner possessed valid driving license and insurance documentation, and that the court cannot be compelled to grant compensation. No further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case