Shivaleela d/o Jaishankar Patil W/o Basawaraj Subshetty vs Soumya W/o Late Appasab — 110/2017

Case under U/o 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB510003572017

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

114/2017

Filing Date

08-12-2017

Registration No

110/2017

Registration Date

08-12-2017

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

U/o 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Shivaleela d/o Jaishankar Patil W/o Basawaraj Subshetty

Adv. S S A

Respondent(s)

Soumya W/o Late Appasab

Sangamma w/o Shivanappa

Gurubai w/o Jaishankar

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

16-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

04-02-2021
Deposition
01-04-2021
Deposition
27-09-2022
Deposition
05-12-2022
Deposition
08-02-2023
Deposition
28-02-2023
Deposition
17-04-2023
Deposition
02-08-2019
Issue
13-10-2020
Issue
06-10-2023
Deposition
21-04-2025
Deposition
04-07-2025
Deposition
31-07-2025
Deposition
13-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No. 110/2017 | Date: 13-01-2026 The defendant's objection to marking the original sale deed as evidence was overruled, with the court noting that any objections will be considered at the final hearing stage. The sale deed dated 27-07-1997 was marked as ExP-21, and mutations were marked as ExP-22. The plaintiff prays for a decree in the suit, and the case is adjourned for further hearing on the merits of the property dispute involving survey numbers 10 and 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No. 110/2017 | Date: 13-01-2026 The defendant's objection to marking the original sale deed as evidence was overruled, with the court noting that any objections will be considered at the final hearing stage. The sale deed dated 27-07-1997 was marked as ExP-21, and mutations were marked as ExP-22. The plaintiff prays for a decree in the suit, and the case is adjourned for further hearing on the merits of the property dispute involving survey numbers 10 and 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case