The State of Karnataka Department of Agri vs Basavaraj Patil S/o Shivarao Patil, Age 57 years, Occ, Agriculture and Business — 105/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIrule1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 09th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB510002322025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-06-2025

Filing Number

107/2025

Filing Date

27-06-2025

Registration No

105/2025

Registration Date

27-06-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section VIIrule1and2

Petitioner(s)

The State of Karnataka Department of Agri

Adv. Noor Iliyas Chadehan

Respondent(s)

Basavaraj Patil S/o Shivarao Patil, Age 57 years, Occ, Agriculture and Business

Chandrakanth S/o Shivarao Patil Alias Shivaraj Malipatil Age 56 Yrs. Occ. Agri. and Business

Shivarao S/o Bapurao Patil, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture

Basavaraj S/o Naganna Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture and Advocate

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

03-03-2026

ORDERS

28-02-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Orders
09-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge of Chittapur allowed the plaintiff's application to withdraw a suit for declaration of title by adverse possession. The court found a formal defect in the suit since the disputed property had already been acquired by the Government under the Land Acquisition Act, and the plaintiff intended to challenge a related compromise decree before the High Court of Karnataka instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge of Chittapur allowed the plaintiff's application to withdraw a suit for declaration of title by adverse possession. The court found a formal defect in the suit since the disputed property had already been acquired by the Government under the Land Acquisition Act, and the plaintiff intended to challenge a related compromise decree before the High Court of Karnataka instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case