Shaik Mohammed S/o Masood Ahmed Age-33yrs Occ-Agriculture and Business now nil vs Santosh S/o Gemu Chavan Age-35yrs Owner of Motor ycle bearing No. KA-32 EY- — 563/2024

Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB510002312024

OBJECTION

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

568/2024

Filing Date

20-04-2024

Registration No

563/2024

Registration Date

15-05-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Shaik Mohammed S/o Masood Ahmed Age-33yrs Occ-Agriculture and Business now nil

Adv. Sri, Vishwanath Reddy Malipatil

Respondent(s)

Santosh S/o Gemu Chavan Age-35yrs Owner of Motor ycle bearing No. KA-32 EY-

Through The Manger IFFCO-GEN INSU CO LTD 1-101/A/TF-2,3rd Floor Kishan Krupa above

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

13-03-2026

OBJECTION

06-03-2026

OBJECTION

20-02-2026

OBJECTION

30-01-2026

OBJECTION

26-12-2025

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

25-09-2025
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 563/2024 | Date: 25-09-2025 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Chittapur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the claimant failed to prove the defendant vehicle's liability in the accident of 20-02-2024. The court rejected the claimant's claims regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000), future treatment costs (₹2,50,000), and monthly income (₹25,000), as the claimant could not substantiate these with adequate evidence. No compensation is awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 563/2024 | Date: 25-09-2025 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Chittapur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the claimant failed to prove the defendant vehicle's liability in the accident of 20-02-2024. The court rejected the claimant's claims regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000), future treatment costs (₹2,50,000), and monthly income (₹25,000), as the claimant could not substantiate these with adequate evidence. No compensation is awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case