Shaik Mohammed S/o Masood Ahmed Age-33yrs Occ-Agriculture and Business now nil vs Santosh S/o Gemu Chavan Age-35yrs Owner of Motor ycle bearing No. KA-32 EY- — 563/2024
Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB510002312024
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
Filing Number
568/2024
Filing Date
20-04-2024
Registration No
563/2024
Registration Date
15-05-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaik Mohammed S/o Masood Ahmed Age-33yrs Occ-Agriculture and Business now nil
Adv. Sri, Vishwanath Reddy Malipatil
Respondent(s)
Santosh S/o Gemu Chavan Age-35yrs Owner of Motor ycle bearing No. KA-32 EY-
Through The Manger IFFCO-GEN INSU CO LTD 1-101/A/TF-2,3rd Floor Kishan Krupa above
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 20-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 30-01-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 26-12-2025 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 563/2024 | Date: 25-09-2025 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Chittapur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the claimant failed to prove the defendant vehicle's liability in the accident of 20-02-2024. The court rejected the claimant's claims regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000), future treatment costs (₹2,50,000), and monthly income (₹25,000), as the claimant could not substantiate these with adequate evidence. No compensation is awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: MVC No. 563/2024 | Date: 25-09-2025 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Chittapur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the claimant failed to prove the defendant vehicle's liability in the accident of 20-02-2024. The court rejected the claimant's claims regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000), future treatment costs (₹2,50,000), and monthly income (₹25,000), as the claimant could not substantiate these with adequate evidence. No compensation is awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts