Vishal S/o Gndappa Occ Coolie R/o Kalkhora Tq Basavakalyan Dist Bidar vs Tayappa S/o Yallappa Dandgule Occ Owner R/o Ambalaga Tq Kamalapur Dist Kalburagi — 425/2023
Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB510001982023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
434/2023
Filing Date
24-03-2023
Registration No
425/2023
Registration Date
11-04-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal S/o Gndappa Occ Coolie R/o Kalkhora Tq Basavakalyan Dist Bidar
Adv. Sri V.S Reddy Advocate
Respondent(s)
Tayappa S/o Yallappa Dandgule Occ Owner R/o Ambalaga Tq Kamalapur Dist Kalburagi
The Manager Cholamandalam MS Geneeral Insurance Company Ltd Regional Office
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 425/2023) decided on December 23, 2025. The court dismissed the compensation claim, finding that the claimant failed to establish a valid basis for damages. The judgment notes that the claimant gave inconsistent and false testimony, filed a case against the wrong vehicle, and provided no credible evidence of injury or loss. The court rejected the claim due to lack of substantiation and false statements made during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 425/2023) decided on December 23, 2025. The court dismissed the compensation claim, finding that the claimant failed to establish a valid basis for damages. The judgment notes that the claimant gave inconsistent and false testimony, filed a case against the wrong vehicle, and provided no credible evidence of injury or loss. The court rejected the claim due to lack of substantiation and false statements made during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts