Praveen S/o of Monappa Age-19yrs Occ-Labour Now nil petrol filling R/o Dandagund now at Malagatti, vs Ennem Vasudeva Reddy S/o Ennem Pedda Venkat Reddy Age Major Occ-Owner of Lorry R/o Anjeneya Swamy — 203/2024
Case under Under Section 166 of M.v. Act 1988 Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB510001152024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
188/2024
Filing Date
08-02-2024
Registration No
203/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Praveen S/o of Monappa Age-19yrs Occ-Labour Now nil petrol filling R/o Dandagund now at Malagatti,
Adv. Sri, B.D MAKA Advocate
Respondent(s)
Ennem Vasudeva Reddy S/o Ennem Pedda Venkat Reddy Age Major Occ-Owner of Lorry R/o Anjeneya Swamy
throuh its Manager Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd, Deshpande Nagar
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 23-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary In MVC No. 203/2024, the court examined witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident case involving a truck collision. The court found the witness testimony to be inconsistent and unreliable, particularly regarding claims about the truck's fitness certificate and permit status. The court rejected false statements made by the witness and concluded that further examination was necessary. The case was adjourned for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MVC No. 203/2024, the court examined witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident case involving a truck collision. The court found the witness testimony to be inconsistent and unreliable, particularly regarding claims about the truck's fitness certificate and permit status. The court rejected false statements made by the witness and concluded that further examination was necessary. The case was adjourned for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts