Sunil vs Chandrakant — 36/2016
Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section U/ORDER7RULE1AND2CPS. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB510001102016
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
38/2016
Filing Date
06-04-2016
Registration No
36/2016
Registration Date
06-04-2016
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil
Adv. M.V.LADDA
Sunita
Anita
Santosh
Sushilabai(Legal Heir)
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant
Mohan
Dilip
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 11-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No. 36/2016 | Date: 29-08-2024 This is a property dispute case (Original Suit No. 36/2016) involving a residential property measuring 50x60 feet purchased in 1973-74 for Rs. 10,000. The court's order on 29-08-2024 allowed the matter to proceed with further arguments, directing continuation of hearing in the lower court. The case involves issues regarding property ownership, title documents, and boundary demarcation, with the court noting the 40-year relationship between the parties and examining relevant purchase deeds and registration documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No. 36/2016 | Date: 29-08-2024 This is a property dispute case (Original Suit No. 36/2016) involving a residential property measuring 50x60 feet purchased in 1973-74 for Rs. 10,000. The court's order on 29-08-2024 allowed the matter to proceed with further arguments, directing continuation of hearing in the lower court. The case involves issues regarding property ownership, title documents, and boundary demarcation, with the court noting the 40-year relationship between the parties and examining relevant purchase deeds and registration documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts