Sandya D/o Bhimashankar Kusale, Age 13 years, Occ. Student vs Smt. Ambubai W/o Baburao Kusale Age 70 years, Occ Household — 32/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIrule1cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB510000542025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
31/2025
Filing Date
15-02-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
15-02-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandya D/o Bhimashankar Kusale, Age 13 years, Occ. Student
Adv. B.R Dandin
Smt. Renuka Alias Roopa W/o Bhimashankar Kusale, Age 38 years, Occ, Household
Respondent(s)
Smt. Ambubai W/o Baburao Kusale Age 70 years, Occ Household
Suresh S/o Baburao Kusale Age 45 years Occ Agriculture
Shobha D/o Baburao Kusale, Age 44 years, Occ, Agriculture
Bhimashankar S/o Baburao Kusale Age 43 years, Occ, Agriculture
Sudha D/o Baburao Kusale, Age 40 years, Occ. Agriculture.
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 09-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 06-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 15-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
The Senior Civil Judge's Court in Chittapur heard Original Suit No. 32/2025 on 08-12-2025. The witness testified and affirmed the affidavit contents, with exhibits NI-1 to NI-3 admitted as evidence. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, and no objection was raised by the defendant who appeared ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Senior Civil Judge's Court in Chittapur heard Original Suit No. 32/2025 on 08-12-2025. The witness testified and affirmed the affidavit contents, with exhibits NI-1 to NI-3 admitted as evidence. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, and no objection was raised by the defendant who appeared ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts