Kalawati vs Shardabai — 11/2015

Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section U/ORDER7RULE1AND2CPS. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB510000512015

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

11/2015

Filing Date

28-01-2015

Registration No

11/2015

Registration Date

29-01-2015

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section U/ORDER7RULE1AND2CPS

Petitioner(s)

Kalawati

Adv. S B Wadi

Nagesh

Jaishree

Vinod ug mother

Jagadevi(Legal Heir)

Respondent(s)

Shardabai

Shivayogi

Mallappa

Surappa

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

03-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

25-02-2026

OBJECTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

30-10-2019
Deposition
17-11-2017
Issue
16-08-2021
Issue
28-04-2025
Deposition
11-06-2025
Deposition
04-07-2025
Deposition
19-08-2025
Deposition

Summary: In Original Suit No. 11/2015 dated 19-08-2025, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness no. 3 (defendant Mrs. M.V.L.'s counsel). The witness testified regarding land and property disputes in Doddapalli village, providing details about land boundaries and family history. The court found the witness testimony to contain contradictions and inconsistencies with the written statement, particularly regarding dates of visits to the disputed property (2014-15) and family succession matters. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Suit No. 11/2015 dated 19-08-2025, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness no. 3 (defendant Mrs. M.V.L.'s counsel). The witness testified regarding land and property disputes in Doddapalli village, providing details about land boundaries and family history. The court found the witness testimony to contain contradictions and inconsistencies with the written statement, particularly regarding dates of visits to the disputed property (2014-15) and family succession matters. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case