PSI Sulepeth PS vs Srimanth S/o Mallappa Natikar Age 55 years R/o Paradarmotakapalli — 3837/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506,354,R/W,149,IPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420044552021
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
09-12-2021
Filing Number
3837/2021
Filing Date
09-12-2021
Registration No
3837/2021
Registration Date
09-12-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
FIR Details
FIR Number
0043
Police Station
SULEPET PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PSI Sulepeth PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Srimanth S/o Mallappa Natikar Age 55 years R/o Paradarmotakapalli
Gurunath So Srimanth
Mallesh So Srimanth
Veeresh So Srimanth
Ashok So Mallappa
Hearing History
Judge: 651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 19-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC 3837/2021, Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Chincholli Outcome: The court examined testimony regarding a medical certificate (MLC) issued by Dr. Lokesh on July 7, 2021, for an injury case. The accused's counsel challenged the authenticity and completeness of the medical documentation, claiming omissions in the injury description and MLC details. The court admitted the witness testimony and maintained the evidentiary value of the medical certificate as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC 3837/2021, Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Chincholli Outcome: The court examined testimony regarding a medical certificate (MLC) issued by Dr. Lokesh on July 7, 2021, for an injury case. The accused's counsel challenged the authenticity and completeness of the medical documentation, claiming omissions in the injury description and MLC details. The court admitted the witness testimony and maintained the evidentiary value of the medical certificate as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts