PSI Chincholi PS vs Shakilsab SO Abdulsab Yakapur — 1327/2024
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 32,34. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420025772024
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
21-08-2024
Filing Number
1328/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
1327/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
FIR Details
FIR Number
0055
Police Station
CHINCHOLI PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PSI Chincholi PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shakilsab SO Abdulsab Yakapur
Hearing History
Judge: 325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case 1327/2024 Summary In this case from Chincholi Court, a PSI (Police Sub-Inspector) filed a case against Shakilsab SO Abdulsab Yakapur for illegal liquor sale. On 01-04-2024, police seized 10 bottles of beer (330 ML), 24 bottles of Original Choice whisky (90 ML), and 13 bottles of Original Choice whisky (180 ML) from the accused. The defense counsel (SSB) challenged the seizure procedure, questioning documentation and chain of custody issues. The case proceeded with examination of witnesses, with no final order on conviction/acquittal reflected in this document—it appears to be a procedural stage of the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1327/2024 Summary In this case from Chincholi Court, a PSI (Police Sub-Inspector) filed a case against Shakilsab SO Abdulsab Yakapur for illegal liquor sale. On 01-04-2024, police seized 10 bottles of beer (330 ML), 24 bottles of Original Choice whisky (90 ML), and 13 bottles of Original Choice whisky (180 ML) from the accused. The defense counsel (SSB) challenged the seizure procedure, questioning documentation and chain of custody issues. The case proceeded with examination of witnesses, with no final order on conviction/acquittal reflected in this document—it appears to be a procedural stage of the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts