Ambika W/o Ganapati age 27 years occ household R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi Now at Ramtirth vs Ganesh S/o Dharmarao Muttangi age 37 years occ agri R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi — 708/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB420018172023
Filing Number
718/2023
Filing Date
07-Dec-2023
Registration No
708/2023
Registration Date
07-Dec-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
651-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ambika W/o Ganapati age 27 years occ household R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi Now at Ramtirth
Adv. VAIJINATH.B.DADI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh S/o Dharmarao Muttangi age 37 years occ agri R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
03-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous 708/2023 | Court: Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 03-12-2025 The case involves a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner (female, age 37) and respondent (male). The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner is the respondent's wife, married on 20-03-2019, alleging she made false accusations, caused domestic disputes, and levied false charges against the respondent and his family members. The petitioner's counsel requested time to respond. The court adjourned the matter and granted time to the petitioner's counsel (SBK) to file reply arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
19-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
23-Aug-2025
Appearance Of Party
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
19-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
31-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
03-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
30-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
21-Sep-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
27-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
01-Jun-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
08-May-2024
objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
03-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
18-Mar-2024
objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
16-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Party
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
06-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Party
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
03-Jan-2024
Stayed
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
08-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 708/2023
Case Summary Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous 708/2023 | Court: Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 03-12-2025 The case involves a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner (female, age 37) and respondent (male). The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner is the respondent's wife, married on 20-03-2019, alleging she made false accusations, caused domestic disputes, and levied false charges against the respondent and his family members. The petitioner's counsel requested time to respond. The court adjourned the matter and granted time to the petitioner's counsel (SBK) to file reply arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts