Ambika W/o Ganapati age 27 years occ household R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi Now at Ramtirth vs Ganesh S/o Dharmarao Muttangi age 37 years occ agri R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi — 708/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB420018172023
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
Filing Number
718/2023
Filing Date
07-12-2023
Registration No
708/2023
Registration Date
07-12-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ambika W/o Ganapati age 27 years occ household R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi Now at Ramtirth
Adv. VAIJINATH.B.DADI
Respondent(s)
Ganesh S/o Dharmarao Muttangi age 37 years occ agri R/o Naranal Tq. Chincholi
Hearing History
Judge: 651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous 708/2023 | Court: Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 03-12-2025 The case involves a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner (female, age 37) and respondent (male). The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner is the respondent's wife, married on 20-03-2019, alleging she made false accusations, caused domestic disputes, and levied false charges against the respondent and his family members. The petitioner's counsel requested time to respond. The court adjourned the matter and granted time to the petitioner's counsel (SBK) to file reply arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous 708/2023 | Court: Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 03-12-2025 The case involves a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner (female, age 37) and respondent (male). The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner is the respondent's wife, married on 20-03-2019, alleging she made false accusations, caused domestic disputes, and levied false charges against the respondent and his family members. The petitioner's counsel requested time to respond. The court adjourned the matter and granted time to the petitioner's counsel (SBK) to file reply arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts