PSI Sulepeth Police Station vs AMBRISH SO SIDDANNA — 1048/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A),279. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420017172022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
27-07-2022
Filing Number
1048/2022
Filing Date
27-07-2022
Registration No
1048/2022
Registration Date
27-07-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PSI Sulepeth Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AMBRISH SO SIDDANNA
MAALAPPA SO SIDDANNA HATTI
Hearing History
Judge: 651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 06-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 10-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 1048/2022) from the Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Chincholli involving a 25-year-old accused. The witness testimony on 06-11-2025 concerns an incident from 13-05-2022 where an auto vehicle was involved in a collision, resulting in injuries. The document records witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with the witness denying direct knowledge of how the accident occurred or whether the accused was responsible, and the defence counsel (NHR) declining further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 1048/2022) from the Additional Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Chincholli involving a 25-year-old accused. The witness testimony on 06-11-2025 concerns an incident from 13-05-2022 where an auto vehicle was involved in a collision, resulting in injuries. The document records witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with the witness denying direct knowledge of how the accident occurred or whether the accused was responsible, and the defence counsel (NHR) declining further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts