The SI Excise Chincholi vs A-1. Venkatappa Balappa Kumbar Age-38, — 612/2019
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 11,12,14,32,38(A). Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420012972019
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
612/2019
Filing Date
05-12-2019
Registration No
612/2019
Registration Date
05-12-2019
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
FIR Details
FIR Number
43/18
Police Station
SI EXCISE PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SI Excise Chincholi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
A-1. Venkatappa Balappa Kumbar Age-38,
A-2. Sidramappa S/o Rachanna Chimman
Hearing History
Judge: 325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
NBW
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 03-12-2025 | NBW | |
| 26-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 06-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary The court (Chief Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi) examined evidence in an excise case (C.C. No. 612/2019) where an accused excise inspector was charged with seizing illicit liquor bottles during a vehicle check on 11-05-2019. The court recorded the witness's deposition under oath and heard arguments from both defense counsels challenging the evidence's credibility regarding the seizure location, chain of custody, and the accused's involvement. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final judgment pronounced in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (Chief Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi) examined evidence in an excise case (C.C. No. 612/2019) where an accused excise inspector was charged with seizing illicit liquor bottles during a vehicle check on 11-05-2019. The court recorded the witness's deposition under oath and heard arguments from both defense counsels challenging the evidence's credibility regarding the seizure location, chain of custody, and the accused's involvement. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final judgment pronounced in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts