PSI Chincholi PS vs GOPALREDDY — 731/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,338,304(A),R/w,187,IMV,Act. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

Evidence-Criminal Next hearing 27-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB420011422022

e-Filing Number

24-05-2022

Filing Number

731/2022

Filing Date

24-May-2022

Registration No

731/2022

Registration Date

24-May-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

325-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0123

Police Station

CHINCHOLI PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,338,304(A),R/w,187,IMV,Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PSI Chincholi PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPALREDDY

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 23-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 731/2022 Summary This case involves witness examination in a motor vehicle accident matter at the Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Chincholi. The witness (age 60, laborer) testified regarding an accident that occurred three years prior involving a truck and two-wheeler. During examination, the witness provided contradictory statements—initially claiming he did not witness the accident, then later stating he saw the truck driver and identified the accused. The court found the witness's testimony highly unfavorable to the prosecution's case and permitted cross-examination accordingly. The case proceeded with examination and cross-examination of witnesses, with the court recording their statements and marking documentary evidence (photographs) related to the accident scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  8. 17-May-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  9. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  10. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 09-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 09-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 09-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  16. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  17. 28-Feb-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  18. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  19. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 26-Jul-2023

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  22. 30-May-2023

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 20-Mar-2023

    NBW

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 26-Dec-2022

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 04-Nov-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  26. 05-Aug-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  27. 24-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 24-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 731/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 731/2022 Summary This case involves witness examination in a motor vehicle accident matter at the Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Chincholi. The witness (age 60, laborer) testified regarding an accident that occurred three years prior involving a truck and two-wheeler. During examination, the witness provided contradictory statements—initially claiming he did not witness the accident, then later stating he saw the truck driver and identified the accused. The court found the witness's testimony highly unfavorable to the prosecution's case and permitted cross-examination accordingly. The case proceeded with examination and cross-examination of witnesses, with the court recording their statements and marking documentary evidence (photographs) related to the accident scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case