State through Chincholi PS vs ARVIND SO MANIK JADHAV age 28 R/O SALAGAR COLONY Salagar Basavantapur — 239/2023
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 34,32. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420009532023
e-Filing Number
14-08-2023
Filing Number
241/2023
Filing Date
14-Aug-2023
Registration No
239/2023
Registration Date
14-Aug-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
325-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Chincholi PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVIND SO MANIK JADHAV age 28 R/O SALAGAR COLONY Salagar Basavantapur
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
30-Oct-2025
NBW
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
08-Oct-2025
NBW
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
20-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
This is a Kannada language criminal court order from Chincholi (Case No. 239/2023). The document is substantially readable, though with some OCR quality issues. Summary: The case involves allegations of illegal liquor sales. On December 30, 2022, police officials conducted a raid and seized approximately 10 liters of liquor from the accused Ramesh Chasa (46 years old). The accused's defense lawyer argued that the evidence collection procedure was flawed, witnesses were unreliable, and the panchnama (official record) was improperly prepared. The court considered arguments from both the prosecution and defense regarding the credibility of witnesses and the chain of custody of evidence. No rehearing was granted, and the case proceeded based on the evidence and testimonies presented in the main trial. The order appears to be recording the trial proceedings and witness examination rather than announcing a final judgment on guilt or bail status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
08-May-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
08-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
10-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence-Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
23-Jul-2024
NBW
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
14-May-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
12-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
27-Feb-2024
NBW
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
16-Jan-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
15-Jan-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
16-Nov-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
04-Oct-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
14-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 239/2023
This is a Kannada language criminal court order from Chincholi (Case No. 239/2023). The document is substantially readable, though with some OCR quality issues. Summary: The case involves allegations of illegal liquor sales. On December 30, 2022, police officials conducted a raid and seized approximately 10 liters of liquor from the accused Ramesh Chasa (46 years old). The accused's defense lawyer argued that the evidence collection procedure was flawed, witnesses were unreliable, and the panchnama (official record) was improperly prepared. The court considered arguments from both the prosecution and defense regarding the credibility of witnesses and the chain of custody of evidence. No rehearing was granted, and the case proceeded based on the evidence and testimonies presented in the main trial. The order appears to be recording the trial proceedings and witness examination rather than announcing a final judgment on guilt or bail status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts