State through Chincholi PS vs MALLAYYA S/O LAXMAYYA ILIGER age 52 R/O BENAKANALLIALLII — 237/2023

Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 32,34. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Evidence-Criminal Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB420009482023

e-Filing Number

11-08-2023

Filing Number

239/2023

Filing Date

11-Aug-2023

Registration No

237/2023

Registration Date

11-Aug-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

325-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act Section 32,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chincholi PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALLAYYA S/O LAXMAYYA ILIGER age 52 R/O BENAKANALLIALLII

  2. 2.Aravind S/o Mareppa Metri age 33 R/O Tumakunt village tq Chincholi

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  3. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case No: C.C. 237/2023 | Court: Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 13-08-2025 Outcome: The case is acquitted/dismissed. The court found the accused (Natraj, age 46) not guilty of illegal liquor trading charges. Despite seizure of 30 Kingfisher beer bottles (650 ML), 23 whisky bottles (90 ML), and 9 rum bottles (180 ML) on 17-03-2023, the defense successfully challenged the prosecution's case, citing inconsistencies in witness testimony and lack of credible evidence linking the accused to the offense. The court accepted the defense arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  10. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 28-May-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  12. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  14. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 02-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 02-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  18. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  19. 03-May-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 16-Jan-2024

    ChargeView PDF

  22. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 15-Jan-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 10-Nov-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 09-Oct-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  26. 11-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 11-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No: C.C. 237/2023 | Court: Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chincholi | Date: 13-08-2025 Outcome: The case is acquitted/dismissed. The court found the accused (Natraj, age 46) not guilty of illegal liquor trading charges. Despite seizure of 30 Kingfisher beer bottles (650 ML), 23 whisky bottles (90 ML), and 9 rum bottles (180 ML) on 17-03-2023, the defense successfully challenged the prosecution's case, citing inconsistencies in witness testimony and lack of credible evidence linking the accused to the offense. The court accepted the defense arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case