The SI Excise Chincholi vs A-Pentayya S/o Bheemayya Age-89 — 89/2023
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 13,14,15,32,38(A),43. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB420002842023
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
89/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
89/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SI Excise Chincholi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
A-Pentayya S/o Bheemayya Age-89
Hearing History
Judge: 325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 11-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 20-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 21-07-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 30-05-2025 | NBW |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal court order from the Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Chincholi (Case No. 89/2023, dated 29-07-2024) involving a 34-year-old accused named Bhagavantray. The order documents witness examination in what appears to be an investigation related to a seizure (panchnama) conducted on 26-08-2022, where alleged contraband was recovered from a location in Halkedi village. The witness testifies about accompanying the investigating officer and signing the panchnama document, while the defense counsel cross-examines the witness's credibility regarding the chain of events and the veracity of the seizure proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal court order from the Principal Civil and First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Chincholi (Case No. 89/2023, dated 29-07-2024) involving a 34-year-old accused named Bhagavantray. The order documents witness examination in what appears to be an investigation related to a seizure (panchnama) conducted on 26-08-2022, where alleged contraband was recovered from a location in Halkedi village. The witness testifies about accompanying the investigating officer and signing the panchnama document, while the defense counsel cross-examines the witness's credibility regarding the chain of events and the veracity of the seizure proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts