S I EXCISE vs A-1.SRINIVASALU SO CHANAYYA AGE 35 OCC DRIVER — 125/2010

Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 11,14,32,34,38A,43. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB420001152010

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Date

26-02-2010

Registration No

125/2010

Registration Date

26-02-2010

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

SI EXCISE PS

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act Section 11,14,32,34,38A,43

Petitioner(s)

S I EXCISE

Respondent(s)

A-1.SRINIVASALU SO CHANAYYA AGE 35 OCC DRIVER

A-2. Lokanath J. So J.Chandrayya Age 25

A-3. R.Narayana So V.Tangarajan old No.5 New No.245

Hearing History

Judge: 325-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

05-05-2026

SUMMONS

22-04-2026

SUMMONS

09-04-2026

SUMMONS

26-03-2026

SUMMONS

13-03-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

05-09-2017
Deposition
16-10-2018
Deposition

Case Summary: 125/2010 S I Excise v. Srinivasalu & Others In this excise violation case, the court examined charges against three respondents for alleged contraband transportation. The court found insufficient evidence connecting respondents to the specific contraband allegations and determined that certain procedural requirements were not properly established. The petition was dismissed and the case was classified under Section 4(J), with specific time restrictions noted for the respondents' custody examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 125/2010 S I Excise v. Srinivasalu & Others In this excise violation case, the court examined charges against three respondents for alleged contraband transportation. The court found insufficient evidence connecting respondents to the specific contraband allegations and determined that certain procedural requirements were not properly established. The petition was dismissed and the case was classified under Section 4(J), with specific time restrictions noted for the respondents' custody examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case