Gangamma W/o Harishankar Shivapuri age 60 year occu Agri and houhold R/o Brahmangalli Chincholi Dis vs Shankar S/o Nandikumar Shivapuri age 45 year occu Business R/o Kallyangaddi Chincholi Dist Kalabura — 9/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
O.S - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB420000322022
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
12-01-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
17-01-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangamma W/o Harishankar Shivapuri age 60 year occu Agri and houhold R/o Brahmangalli Chincholi Dis
Adv. JAGANATH P AGNIHOTRI
Sanjeevkumar S/o Harishankar shivapuri age 35 year occu Agri R/o Brahmangalli Chincholi Tq. Chincho
Shobha W/o Rajkumar Shivapuri age 29 year occu Agri and household R/o Brahmangalli Chincholi Tq. Chi
Respondent(s)
Shankar S/o Nandikumar Shivapuri age 45 year occu Business R/o Kallyangaddi Chincholi Dist Kalabura
Karankuamar S/o Nandikumar age 55 yearoccu Agri R/o Kallyangaddi Chincholi Tq. Chincholi Dist Kalabu
Veersheety S/o Nandikumar Shivapuri Occu Bisomess R/o Kallyangaddi Chincholi Tq. Chincholi Dist Kal
Umadevo W/o Sadashiv Shivapuri age 46 year occu Agri Husehold R/o Kallyangaddi Chincholi Tq. Chincho
Hearing History
Judge: 651-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 01-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 14-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 29-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
In OS No. 09/2025 dated 01-12-2025, the court heard arguments from the plaintiff's counsel S.K. Vakil. The plaintiff filed an affidavit in place of the main hearing, and supporting documents were marked as exhibits (Exh. 1-3). The court granted time for the main hearing upon request and adjourned the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In OS No. 09/2025 dated 01-12-2025, the court heard arguments from the plaintiff's counsel S.K. Vakil. The plaintiff filed an affidavit in place of the main hearing, and supporting documents were marked as exhibits (Exh. 1-3). The court granted time for the main hearing upon request and adjourned the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts