Hanamanth S/o Shivaraj Age 28 years, Occ, Coolie. vs Aruna W/o Mohan Golab, Age Major, Occ, Owner of Eartiga. — 1487/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB410004902022

Filing Number

1586/2022

Filing Date

30-Dec-2022

Registration No

1487/2023

Registration Date

04-Nov-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hanamanth S/o Shivaraj Age 28 years, Occ, Coolie.

    Adv. SHASHIKANT.S. ADAKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aruna W/o Mohan Golab, Age Major, Occ, Owner of Eartiga.

  2. 2.The New India Assurance co. Ltd, Through its Divisional Manager,

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case No. M.V.C. 1487/2023 (PW-1) On 06-03-2026, the court continued the main trial proceedings. Witness PW-1 was examined and oath administered. Evidence of the first witness was marked as Exhibit NP-13, and evidence of the second witness was marked as Exhibit NP-14. The case was adjourned to allow the opposing party to cross-examine the witnesses as per their request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  13. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  14. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  17. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  18. 13-Dec-2024

    IssueView PDF

  19. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 29-Nov-2024

    For-Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  22. 08-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 04-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 09-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 06-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  26. 02-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  27. 12-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  28. 21-Jun-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  29. 03-May-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  30. 05-Apr-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  31. 23-Feb-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  32. 12-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  33. 08-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 30-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1487/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case No. M.V.C. 1487/2023 (PW-1) On 06-03-2026, the court continued the main trial proceedings. Witness PW-1 was examined and oath administered. Evidence of the first witness was marked as Exhibit NP-13, and evidence of the second witness was marked as Exhibit NP-14. The case was adjourned to allow the opposing party to cross-examine the witnesses as per their request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case