Saibanna S/o Bhimanna, Age 50 years Occ, Agriculture, Now Nil. vs Shivaputra S/o Adappa Hosa Gowdru, Age 33 years, Occ, Hotel Business and Owner of the motor cab. — 1523/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB410004592023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
1386/2023
Filing Date
15-09-2023
Registration No
1523/2023
Registration Date
07-11-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saibanna S/o Bhimanna, Age 50 years Occ, Agriculture, Now Nil.
Adv. NEELKANTH H RATHOD
Respondent(s)
Shivaputra S/o Adappa Hosa Gowdru, Age 33 years, Occ, Hotel Business and Owner of the motor cab.
Nagaraj S/o Sarabanna Hosagaudru, Age 32 years,
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE Co. Ltd. Through its General Manager branch office
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 06-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 23-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 24-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 29-10-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The interim application filed by IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company to reject the motor vehicle compensation petition as time-barred has been rejected. The court found the petitioner's reasons for the 100-day delay in filing the claim (post-accident treatment and document collection) acceptable and exercised discretion to condone the delay in the interest of justice, allowing the main compensation petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The interim application filed by IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company to reject the motor vehicle compensation petition as time-barred has been rejected. The court found the petitioner's reasons for the 100-day delay in filing the claim (post-accident treatment and document collection) acceptable and exercised discretion to condone the delay in the interest of justice, allowing the main compensation petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts