Savitrabai W/o Gurunath Biradar, Age.38 Years, Occ. Household. vs Shivakumar S/o Virabhadrappa, Age. Major, Occ. Owner of Splendor Plus No.32 EK- — 1456/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB410004092023
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1549/2023
Filing Date
10-10-2023
Registration No
1456/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savitrabai W/o Gurunath Biradar, Age.38 Years, Occ. Household.
Adv. SRINIVAS N. BANDI
Laxmi D/o Gurunath Biradar, Age.21 Years, Occ. Student.
Anandkumar S/o Gurunath Biradar, Age.19 years, Occ. Student.
Mahadevi W/o Neelakanthappa Biradar, Age.62 Years, Occ. Household.
Respondent(s)
Shivakumar S/o Virabhadrappa, Age. Major, Occ. Owner of Splendor Plus No.32 EK-
The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 07-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 05-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 04-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 08-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MVC No. 1456/2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found the petitioners' (Savitrabai, Laxmi, and Anandkumar) claims regarding negligent driving and insurance liability to be baseless. The court determined that the evidence presented, including affidavits and witness statements, contained false information. The court rejected the petitioners' arguments that vehicle KA-32 EK-9796 was being driven negligently, and noted discrepancies in the police final report regarding the incident under CC No. 1098/2022, Crime No. 33/2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MVC No. 1456/2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found the petitioners' (Savitrabai, Laxmi, and Anandkumar) claims regarding negligent driving and insurance liability to be baseless. The court determined that the evidence presented, including affidavits and witness statements, contained false information. The court rejected the petitioners' arguments that vehicle KA-32 EK-9796 was being driven negligently, and noted discrepancies in the police final report regarding the incident under CC No. 1098/2022, Crime No. 33/2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts