Pradeep S/o Vithalrao Mustapur Age 30 yrs Occ Agri and Milk Seller R/o Gadilingadalli Tq Chincholi vs Arjun S/o Saibanna Age 40 yrs Occ owner of the Ape Auto R/o Ainapur Tq chincholi Dist Kalaburagi — 1421/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 166. Status: HEARING.. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB410003802024

HEARING.

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

28-08-2024

Filing Number

1276/2024

Filing Date

29-08-2024

Registration No

1421/2024

Registration Date

23-10-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Pradeep S/o Vithalrao Mustapur Age 30 yrs Occ Agri and Milk Seller R/o Gadilingadalli Tq Chincholi

Adv. NEELKANTES HEMASINGH

Respondent(s)

Arjun S/o Saibanna Age 40 yrs Occ owner of the Ape Auto R/o Ainapur Tq chincholi Dist Kalaburagi

The manager HDFC ERGO General insurance company limited 2nd Floor 101/A/SF/2 Kishan krupa

Hearing History

Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

06-03-2026

HEARING.

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE

19-11-2025

EVIDENCE

29-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

31-01-2025
Issue
19-11-2025
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 1421/2024 (Petition for Compensation) Court Order (dated 06-03-2026): The petition is remitted for further inquiry. The court found significant discrepancies in the petitioner's claims regarding an alleged motor vehicle accident on 07-03-2024. While medical records (MLC and hospital documents) indicate injury treatment, the court noted inconsistencies in the nature and extent of injuries claimed versus documented evidence. The petitioner failed to produce adequate supporting documents for medical expenses (₹6-5 lakhs claimed) and employment impact despite holding an MSc Chemistry degree. The court also questioned the delay in filing and inconsistencies in the accident details. Further investigation is required before compensation can be determined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 1421/2024 (Petition for Compensation) Court Order (dated 06-03-2026): The petition is remitted for further inquiry. The court found significant discrepancies in the petitioner's claims regarding an alleged motor vehicle accident on 07-03-2024. While medical records (MLC and hospital documents) indicate injury treatment, the court noted inconsistencies in the nature and extent of injuries claimed versus documented evidence. The petitioner failed to produce adequate supporting documents for medical expenses (₹6-5 lakhs claimed) and employment impact despite holding an MSc Chemistry degree. The court also questioned the delay in filing and inconsistencies in the accident details. Further investigation is required before compensation can be determined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case