Mallikarjun S/o Maruti, Age 42 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi. vs Vijayakumar S/o Maruti, Age Major, Occ Owner of vehicle R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi. — 1160/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166 MV Act. Status: Arguments-CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Arguments-CIVIL Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB410003012024

Filing Number

1127/2024

Filing Date

29-Jul-2024

Registration No

1160/2024

Registration Date

23-Aug-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166 MV Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mallikarjun S/o Maruti, Age 42 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.

    Adv. VEERENDRA .S.KORI

  2. 2.Vithal S/o Maruti, Age 45 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayakumar S/o Maruti, Age Major, Occ Owner of vehicle R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.

  2. 2.The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Divisional Manager, Market Road, Kalaburagi.

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  3. 07-May-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 05-May-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1160/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the respondent insurance company's contention that the deceased's injuries were not accident-related. The petitioners' (Mallikarjun and Vithal) main hearing arguments were accepted, while the insurance company's counter-arguments were dismissed. The court found the insurance company's claims of false evidence and fabricated documents to be without merit. The case proceeded with the petitioners' witnesses' testimony being recorded on 20-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  19. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    IssueView PDF

  22. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    For-Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    For-Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  26. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  27. 14-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  28. 31-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  29. 10-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  30. 14-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  31. 29-Nov-2024

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  33. 04-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  34. 02-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 29-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1160/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1160/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the respondent insurance company's contention that the deceased's injuries were not accident-related. The petitioners' (Mallikarjun and Vithal) main hearing arguments were accepted, while the insurance company's counter-arguments were dismissed. The court found the insurance company's claims of false evidence and fabricated documents to be without merit. The case proceeded with the petitioners' witnesses' testimony being recorded on 20-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case