Mallikarjun S/o Maruti, Age 42 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi. vs Vijayakumar S/o Maruti, Age Major, Occ Owner of vehicle R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi. — 1160/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166 MV Act. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB410003012024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1127/2024
Filing Date
29-07-2024
Registration No
1160/2024
Registration Date
23-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mallikarjun S/o Maruti, Age 42 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.
Adv. VEERENDRA .S.KORI
Vithal S/o Maruti, Age 45 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.
Respondent(s)
Vijayakumar S/o Maruti, Age Major, Occ Owner of vehicle R/o Rustumpur, Tq Chincholi.
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Divisional Manager, Market Road, Kalaburagi.
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 07-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 05-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 08-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1160/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the respondent insurance company's contention that the deceased's injuries were not accident-related. The petitioners' (Mallikarjun and Vithal) main hearing arguments were accepted, while the insurance company's counter-arguments were dismissed. The court found the insurance company's claims of false evidence and fabricated documents to be without merit. The case proceeded with the petitioners' witnesses' testimony being recorded on 20-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1160/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the respondent insurance company's contention that the deceased's injuries were not accident-related. The petitioners' (Mallikarjun and Vithal) main hearing arguments were accepted, while the insurance company's counter-arguments were dismissed. The court found the insurance company's claims of false evidence and fabricated documents to be without merit. The case proceeded with the petitioners' witnesses' testimony being recorded on 20-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts