Mallamma W/o Bheemsha, age. 42 years, Occ. agriculture and household. vs Subhadramma W/o Chandrappa, age. 65years, occ. agriculture and household. — 94/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VII,1,2. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB410002932023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
95/2023
Filing Date
25-07-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
25-07-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mallamma W/o Bheemsha, age. 42 years, Occ. agriculture and household.
Adv. SHIVARAYA.H. HADIMANI
Saraswathi W/o Bheemsha, age.37 years, Occ.agriculture and household.
Respondent(s)
Subhadramma W/o Chandrappa, age. 65years, occ. agriculture and household.
Gangamma W/o Gundappa, age. 32 years, Occ. agriculture and household.
Nagamma W/o Dayanand, age.29 years, Occ. agriculture and household.
Jagappa S/o Chandrappa, age.27 years, Occ. agriculture.
Gundappa S/o Chandrappa, age.24 years, Occ. agriculture.
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court heard arguments from both the plaintiff (V.S.D) and defendant's counsel on 06-03-2026 in case O.S. No. 94/2023. The plaintiff's counsel submitted evidence and arguments, which were found to be in order, while the defendant's counsel was given time to cross-examine the witnesses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court heard arguments from both the plaintiff (V.S.D) and defendant's counsel on 06-03-2026 in case O.S. No. 94/2023. The plaintiff's counsel submitted evidence and arguments, which were found to be in order, while the defendant's counsel was given time to cross-examine the witnesses. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts