Mahesh S/o Maruti Gonda 26 yrs Occ Lorry driver now nil vs Rajappa S/o Vithal Koli 43 yrs Occ Transport Business — 2/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 3,4 Rw 22W(E)C. Status: HEARING.. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

ECA - Employees Compensation Applica

CNR: KAKB410002872022

HEARING.

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

2/2022

Filing Date

24-08-2022

Registration No

2/2022

Registration Date

24-08-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 3,4 Rw 22W(E)C

Petitioner(s)

Mahesh S/o Maruti Gonda 26 yrs Occ Lorry driver now nil

Adv. Sunkad MALLIKARJUN S

Respondent(s)

Rajappa S/o Vithal Koli 43 yrs Occ Transport Business

Salauddin S/o M Hussain age major Occ business

M/s HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd., Branch office No.15/1, 2nd floor, Shanfernarayana buil

Hearing History

Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

06-03-2026

HEARING.

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

28-01-2026

EVIDENCE

19-11-2025

EVIDENCE

30-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

02-02-2024
Issue
09-08-2024
Deposition
20-12-2024
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition
06-02-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: ECA 2/2022 PW-1 (Karnataka High Court) Order Date: 06-02-2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for further hearing. The court examined witness testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 27-02-2021 in Maharashtra. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims regarding wages, treatment expenses, and the defendant's employment relationship, and rejected several unsubstantiated assertions. The matter is remanded for re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: ECA 2/2022 PW-1 (Karnataka High Court) Order Date: 06-02-2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for further hearing. The court examined witness testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 27-02-2021 in Maharashtra. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims regarding wages, treatment expenses, and the defendant's employment relationship, and rejected several unsubstantiated assertions. The matter is remanded for re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case