Jayshree W/o Late Basawaraj Shinge, Age 47 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag vs Parvati W/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 54 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag — 94/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB410002732024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
94/2024
Filing Date
05-08-2024
Registration No
94/2024
Registration Date
05-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayshree W/o Late Basawaraj Shinge, Age 47 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
Adv. JAGANATH S.K.
Muktanand S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 28 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Akash S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 25 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Respondent(s)
Parvati W/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 54 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
Sadanand S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 37 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Umesh S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 33 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Bharat S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 28 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Hemavati D/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 35 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
Pooja D/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 32 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Mahadev Swamy S/o Gurupadayya, Age 59 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
SUMMONS
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
HEARING.
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 26-02-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING. |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary OS No. 94/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi | Dated 06-03-2026 Defendant No. 7's Interim Application (I.A. No. II) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(A) of CPC was dismissed. The court found that Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the partition and separate possession suit, as he had entered into an agreement for sale of the disputed property with the plaintiffs' deceased father, creating a valid cause of action against him. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary OS No. 94/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi | Dated 06-03-2026 Defendant No. 7's Interim Application (I.A. No. II) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(A) of CPC was dismissed. The court found that Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the partition and separate possession suit, as he had entered into an agreement for sale of the disputed property with the plaintiffs' deceased father, creating a valid cause of action against him. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts