Jayshree W/o Late Basawaraj Shinge, Age 47 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag vs Parvati W/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 54 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag — 94/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB410002732024
Filing Number
94/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
94/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayshree W/o Late Basawaraj Shinge, Age 47 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
Adv. JAGANATH S.K.
-
2.Muktanand S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 28 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
-
3.Akash S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 25 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parvati W/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 54 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
-
2.Sadanand S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 37 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
-
3.Umesh S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 33 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
-
4.Bharat S/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 28 yrs, Occ Coolie, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
-
5.Hemavati D/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 35 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburag
-
6.Pooja D/o Late. Basawaraj Shinge, Age 32 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
-
7.Mahadev Swamy S/o Gurupadayya, Age 59 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Mogha, Tq Kalagi, Dist Kalaburagi.
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary OS No. 94/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi | Dated 06-03-2026 Defendant No. 7's Interim Application (I.A. No. II) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(A) of CPC was dismissed. The court found that Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the partition and separate possession suit, as he had entered into an agreement for sale of the disputed property with the plaintiffs' deceased father, creating a valid cause of action against him. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
12-Mar-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
17-Feb-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
20-Jan-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
16-Dec-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
20-Nov-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
28-Oct-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
24-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
22-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
07-Aug-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2024
Case Summary OS No. 94/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi | Dated 06-03-2026 Defendant No. 7's Interim Application (I.A. No. II) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(A) of CPC was dismissed. The court found that Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the partition and separate possession suit, as he had entered into an agreement for sale of the disputed property with the plaintiffs' deceased father, creating a valid cause of action against him. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts