Bandapally Srikanth vs Mr Patnam Lajar — 1200/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 166. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB410002622025
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
1200/2025
Filing Date
11-04-2025
Registration No
1200/2025
Registration Date
19-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bandapally Srikanth
Adv. B.V. PATIL
Respondent(s)
Mr Patnam Lajar
The Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Through
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1200/2025 Petitioner: Bandapally Srikanth Respondents: Mr Patnam Lajar and Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. On 15-05-2026, witness PW-1 (the petitioner) testified in this motor vehicle accident case. The witness described a collision involving a Honda Activa scooter while traveling to Tandur. He claimed injuries including facial fractures and underwent 15 days of hospitalization with medical expenses around 4-5 lakhs. The witness alleged false claims were filed with the insurance company and accused the other party of fabricating evidence. However, the court found discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding who was operating the vehicle and questioned the authenticity of medical documents presented. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination and investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1200/2025 Petitioner: Bandapally Srikanth Respondents: Mr Patnam Lajar and Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. On 15-05-2026, witness PW-1 (the petitioner) testified in this motor vehicle accident case. The witness described a collision involving a Honda Activa scooter while traveling to Tandur. He claimed injuries including facial fractures and underwent 15 days of hospitalization with medical expenses around 4-5 lakhs. The witness alleged false claims were filed with the insurance company and accused the other party of fabricating evidence. However, the court found discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding who was operating the vehicle and questioned the authenticity of medical documents presented. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination and investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts