Jadav Sangram S/o Late. Jadav Cheniya, Age 67 yrs, R/o Ramchandrapuram, Dist Medak. TS vs Suresh Jadava S/o Sangram Jadav, Age 46 yrs, R/o Patighanpur, Dist Sangareddy. TS — 74/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB410002232024

Filing Number

74/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

74/2024

Registration Date

27-Jun-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jadav Sangram S/o Late. Jadav Cheniya, Age 67 yrs, R/o Ramchandrapuram, Dist Medak. TS

    Adv. B.SUDARSHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Jadava S/o Sangram Jadav, Age 46 yrs, R/o Patighanpur, Dist Sangareddy. TS

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Issues.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 74/2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court restrained the defendant from alienating agricultural property pending trial. The plaintiff (67-year-old father) alleged the defendant (46-year-old son) fraudulently obtained a gift deed while the plaintiff was ill, then mutated the property in his own name. The defendant claimed the gift was voluntary. Finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case of fraud, balance of convenience favoring him, and irreparable harm if injunction denied, the court prohibited property alienation until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 19-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  14. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  16. 25-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  18. 04-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  19. 02-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 27-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 11-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  22. 16-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 18-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 19-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 18-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  26. 28-Jun-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  27. 28-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 74/2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court restrained the defendant from alienating agricultural property pending trial. The plaintiff (67-year-old father) alleged the defendant (46-year-old son) fraudulently obtained a gift deed while the plaintiff was ill, then mutated the property in his own name. The defendant claimed the gift was voluntary. Finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case of fraud, balance of convenience favoring him, and irreparable harm if injunction denied, the court prohibited property alienation until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case