Rukkibai W/o Late. Shivaram, Age 52 yrs, Occ Agri R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi vs Seetabai W/o Late. Gopal, Age 55 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi — 71/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB410002152024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

71/2024

Filing Date

24-06-2024

Registration No

71/2024

Registration Date

24-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

Acts & Sections

cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Rukkibai W/o Late. Shivaram, Age 52 yrs, Occ Agri R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi

Adv. NEELKANTH H RATHOD

Bheemshetty S/o Shivaram, Age 35 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda, Tq Chincholi

Respondent(s)

Seetabai W/o Late. Gopal, Age 55 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi

Devidas S/o Late. Gopal, Age 36 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi

Jainabai W/o Vithal, Age 35 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Srinagar Pedda Tanda Venkatapur, Tq Chincholi

Hearing History

Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE

11-11-2025

EVIDENCE

13-09-2025

EVIDENCE

03-09-2025

A.D.R.

Interim Orders

25-06-2024
Orders

Summary: The court granted an ad interim injunction order restraining the defendant from alienating, mortgaging, or creating any charge over the suit properties (joint family properties) in any manner until the next hearing on 18-07-2024. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on the affidavit, plaint averments, and record of rights documents, and determined that granting the injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable loss and frustration of the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an ad interim injunction order restraining the defendant from alienating, mortgaging, or creating any charge over the suit properties (joint family properties) in any manner until the next hearing on 18-07-2024. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on the affidavit, plaint averments, and record of rights documents, and determined that granting the injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable loss and frustration of the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case