Goribee W/o Manjile Patel, Age 70 yrs, occ Agri, R/o Marpalli, Tq Chincholi, Dist Kalaburagi. vs Shukur Patel S/o Maheboob Patel, Age 60 yrs, Occ Business, R/o Hyderabad. — 26/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Appearance Of Party. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Appearance Of Party Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAKB410002122024

Filing Number

26/2024

Filing Date

22-Jun-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

22-Jun-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Goribee W/o Manjile Patel, Age 70 yrs, occ Agri, R/o Marpalli, Tq Chincholi, Dist Kalaburagi.

    Adv. S.G.JAPATI

  2. 2.Rabanbee W/o Hussain Patel, Age 65 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Pardarmotakpalli, Tq Chincholi.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shukur Patel S/o Maheboob Patel, Age 60 yrs, Occ Business, R/o Hyderabad.

  2. 2.Ismailbee W/o Gani Patel, Age 50 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Pashabhai Tailwale, Hyderabad.

  3. 3.Moulanbee W/o Mohammed Shareef, Age 40 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Hyderabad.

  4. 4.Fatimabee D/o Gani Patel, Age 40 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Hyderabad.

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi Case: E.P. No. 26/2024 Date: 27th March 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) filed by Hussain Patel seeking to be impleaded as the 5th judgment debtor in the execution petition. The court found that the land (Sy. No. 15) claimed by the applicant was not part of the original decree and therefore the applicant was not a necessary party to the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Party

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Orders.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  14. 03-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  15. 06-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  16. 06-Feb-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  17. 16-Jan-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  18. 12-Dec-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  19. 21-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  20. 24-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  21. 26-Sep-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  22. 29-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  23. 01-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  24. 11-Jul-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  25. 24-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 22-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Chincholi Case: E.P. No. 26/2024 Date: 27th March 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) filed by Hussain Patel seeking to be impleaded as the 5th judgment debtor in the execution petition. The court found that the land (Sy. No. 15) claimed by the applicant was not part of the original decree and therefore the applicant was not a necessary party to the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case